Skip to main content

Table 4 Attitudes of medical and non-medical students towards CAM

From: Knowledge, attitude, perceived effectiveness and self-practice of complementary and alternative medicine: a cross-sectional comparison between medical and non-medical students of Bangladesh

Sl.no.

Statements

Medical Students (n=329)

Non-medical students (n=247)

p-value*

1

Incorporation of CAM with conventional medicine would result in increased patient satisfaction.

3.4

3.7

<0.001

2

CAM is unsafe and ineffective.

2.9

2.9

0.89

3

I am interested in exploring new CAM modalities

3.7

3.8

0.05

4

CAM is only effective in treating minor complaints and ailments.

3.2

3.3

0.41

5

The results of CAM are in most cases due to a placebo effect.

3.2

3.2

0.48

6

CAM is a threat to public health.

2.9

2.8

0.19

7

CAM needs more research.

3.9

3.9

0.42

8

CAM should be bound by the law.

3.5

3.5

0.80

9

It is important to consult a health professional before using CAM.

3.9

3.9

0.88

10

CAM is cost effective.

3.3

3.4

0.13

11

A doctor should know CAM methods

3.7

3.9

0.004

12

It is important to have a basic understanding of CAM before using them

3.9

3.9

0.44

13

There are many "quacks" in complementary medicine.

3.5

3.5

0.65

  1. Responses were based on a 5-point Likert-type scale with 1 = Strongly Disagree 2 = Disagree 3 = Neutral 4 = Agree 5 = Strongly Agree
  2. *Mann-Whitney U test was used to determine the differences between medical and non-medical students
  3. Significant p-values are in bold