Skip to main content

Table 3 Perceived effectiveness of CAM modalities between medical and non-medical students (% of respondents)

From: Knowledge, attitude, perceived effectiveness and self-practice of complementary and alternative medicine: a cross-sectional comparison between medical and non-medical students of Bangladesh

Modalities

Medical students (n=329)

Non-medical students (n=247)

p-value*

Effective

Not effective

Effective

Not effective

Acupuncture

172(52.2)

157(47.7)

131(53.0)

116(46.9)

0.857

Aromatherapy

126(38.3)

203(61.7)

123(49.8)

124(50.2)

0.006

Ayurveda

223(67.7)

106(32.2)

193(78.1)

54(21.8)

0.006

Chiropractic

156(47.4)

173(52.5)

137(55.4)

110(44.5)

0.056

Spiritual Healing

123(37.3)

206(62.6)

110(44.5)

137(55.4)

0.084

Herbal medicine

237(72.0)

92(27.9)

200(80.9)

47(19.0)

0.013

Homeopathy

239(72.6)

90(27.3)

213(86.2)

34(13.7)

<0.001

Massage

154(46.8)

175(53.1)

146(59.1)

101(40.8)

0.003

Hijama/Cupping

209(63.5)

120(36.4)

194(78.5)

53(21.4)

<0.001

Traditional Chinese Medicine

267(81.1)

62(18.8)

212(85.8)

35(14.1)

0.138

Yoga

149(45.2)

180(54.7)

131(53.0)

116(46.9)

0.066

Unani

106(32.2)

223(67.7)

107(43.3)

140(56.6)

0.006

  1. *Pearson's chi-square test was used to determine the differences between medical and non-medical students
  2. Significant p-values are in bold