Table 1 Overview of the results of phase one of the SAGE process evaluation
Program theories | Who did the interventions strategies work best for? | How did they work (mechanisms)? |
|---|---|---|
1. It’s worth the effort | • SAGE attracted people who believed in the efficacy of yoga and who had interests in healthy ageing /or fall prevention • Experienced instructors encouraged everyone to practice at their own level, but it best suited those with physical capabilities in the moderate range who had manageable levels of pain | Value expectancy Therapeutic alliance Achievement/Mastery |
2. In expert hands | ||
3. A communal experience | • Group classes suited those who valued social interaction and/or shared experiences • Studio-based classes suited those who liked to benchmark their physical competence and/or peer-check their poses | Shared experience Social connection Social comparison Position checking |
4. Finding yoga within reach | • Free classes enabled people with financial constraints to try yoga and continue with it • Studio classes only worked for those with easy access to a participating yoga studio • Online classes required suitable home environments and willingness to use video conferencing software (Zoom) (with support) | Accessibility Convenience Gratitude |
5. Building yoga habits | • Twice-weekly classes over 12 months plus homework suited people who could prioritise SAGE and were keen to progress • Flexible classes suited those with carer commitments, travel plans, injury or illness • Goal-setting was seldom adopted by participants in SAGE | Purposeful structure Momentum Accountability Continuity |
6. Yoga’s special properties | • The SAGE program utilises traditional yoga practices which worked most effectively for those who were open to yoga as a disciplined and holistic practice | Embodiment Mindfulness |