Skip to main content

Table 6 IC50 µg/mL ± SEM of cytotoxicity of PSD remedy and its ingredients against two types of cancer cell lines and one non-cancerous cell line using Sulforhodamine B (SRB) assay (n = 3)

From: Exploring in vitro anti-proliferative and anti-inflammatory activities of Prasachandaeng remedy, and its bioactive compounds

Plant species

Code

%Yield (w/w)

IC50 µg/mL ± SEM and Selective index (SI)

HepG2

KKU-M156

HaCaT

Bouea macrophylla Griff

BM95

3.52

36.15 ± 0.54****

(SI = ND)

60.53 ± 1.08****

(SI = ND)

 > 100****

Caesalpinia sappan L

CS95

8.17

6.44 ± 0.54****

(SI = 6.7)

4.77 ± 0.57****

(SI = 9.0)

43.14 ± 1.46****

Citrus aurantiifolia (Christm.)

CA95

2.63

92.96 ± 2.22****

(SI = ND)

 > 100****

(SI = ND)

 > 100****

Dracaena cochinchinensis (Lour.) S.C. Chen

DC95

10.45

7.72 ± 1.87****

(SI = 5.2)

5.27 ± 5.01****

(SI = 7.7)

40.47 ± 0.39****

Heliciopsis terminalis (Kurz)

HT95

1.99

44.50 ± 1.01****

(SI = ND)

43.42 ± 0.29****

(SI = ND)

 > 100****

Jasminum sambac (L.) Aiton

JS95

8.59

95.01 ± 0.41****

(SI = ND)

85.77 ± 2.25****

(SI = ND)

 > 100****

Kaempferia galanga L

KG95

3.49

7.81 ± 2.39****

(SI = ND)

32.95 ± 3.75****

(SI = ND)

 > 100****

Ligusticum chuanxiong Hort

LC95

8.50

11.87 ± 4.43****

(SI = ND)

43.55 ± 4.02****

(SI = ND)

 > 100****

Mammea siamensis T. Anderson

MS95

19.41

5.67 ± 0.32****

(SI = 9.0)

7.52 ± 1.05****

(SI = 6.8)

51.20 ± 0.68****

Mesua ferrea L

MF95

11.57

7.10 ± 0.16****

(SI = 7.3)

27.17 ± 2.86****

(SI = 1.9)

51.99 ± 0.37****

Myristica fragrans Houtt

MYF95

2.88

5.67 ± 0.32****

(SI = 4.6)

5.02 ± 3.14****

(SI = 5.2)

26.32 ± 2.67****

Nelumbo nucifera Gaertn

NN95

8.08

 > 100****

(SI = ND)

 > 100****

(SI = ND)

 > 100****

Prasachandaeng remedy

PSD95

13.62

10.45 ± 1.98****

(SI = 5.3)

4.53 ± 0.74****

(SI = 12.2)

55.45 ± 1.73****

Vincristine sulfate

-

-

0.012 ± 0.0005

(SI = 0.00058)

0.0026 ± 0.001

(SI = 0.0026)

0.000007 ± 0.00

  1. ND Not detected, SI Selective index calculated by IC50 of normal cells /IC50 of cancer cells. Data were presented as mean ± SEM and analyzed by one-way ANOVA and Dunnett’s multiple comparison tests. Significant different presented the **** p < 0.0001 compared with a standard drug (Vincristine sulfate) in corresponding cell line