Phytochemistry, anti-diabetic and antioxidant potentials of Allium consanguineum Kunth

Table 2 Alpha amylase inhibitory potentials of Allium consanguineum

Samples	Conc (μg/ml)	Percent Inhibition (mean ± SEM)	IC₅₀ (μg/ml)
Methanolic extract	1000	75.29 ± 0.64***	285
	500	64.72 ± 0.89***
	250	47.44 ± 0.86***
	125	42.78 ± 0.45***
	62.5	29.88 ± 0.89***
n-Hexane fraction	1000	79.95 ± 2.01**	310
	500	58.89 ± 4.82***
	250	46.22 ± 1.28***
	125	40.51 ± 0.54***
	62.5	35.40 ± 0.82***
Chloroform fraction	1000	84.76 ± 0.61*	55
	500	81.36 ± 1.31***
	250	66.27 ± 1.06***
	125	61.17 ± 1.30***
	62.5	55.82 ± 0.95***
Ethyl acetate fraction	1000	67.60 ± 1.63***	100
	500	64.42 ± 1.89***
	250	58.25 ± 1.40***
	125	51.10 ± 0.60***
	62.5	46.68 ± 0.22***
Aqueous fraction	1000	75.52 ± 3.28***	240
	500	55.59 ± 3.28***
	250	50.83 ± 1.21***
	125	45.87 ± 0.85***
	62.5	34.54 ± 0.60***
Acarbose	1000	87.49 ± 0.60	20.20
	500	76.28 ± 1.94
	250	70.08 ± 1.04
	125	65.37 ± 0.56
	62.5	62.93 ± 1.73

All values are taken as Mean ± SEM (n = 3). The P values less than 0.05 were considered as statistically significant. Values significantly different in comparison to standard drug i.e.** = P < 0.01 and *** = P < 0.001

ISSN: 2662-7671