Phytochemistry, anti-diabetic and antioxidant potentials of Allium consanguineum Kunth

Table 1 Alpha glucosidase inhibitory potentials of Allium consanguineum

Samples	Conc (μg/ml)	Percent Inhibition (mean ± SEM)	IC₅₀ (μg/ml)
Methanolic extract	1000	41.10 ± 0.65***	1123
	500	37.33 ± 0.33***
	250	17.76 ± 0.40***
	125	15.00 ± 0.58***
	62.5	07.00 ± 1.00***
n-Hexane fraction	1000	32.77 ± 0.76***	1248
	500	26.67 ± 0.88***
	250	19.93 ± 0.49***
	125	16.33 ± 0.88***
	62.5	06.17 ± 0.13***
Chloroform fraction	1000	53.67 ± 0.67***	824
	500	44.51 ± 1.67***
	250	36.38 ± 1.15***
	125	29.45 ± 0.83***
	62.5	19.73 ± 0.69***
Ethyl acetate fraction	1000	47.54 ± 0.44***	1076
	500	36.90 ± 1.05***
	250	24.53 ± 0.55***
	125	20.03 ± 1.53***
	62.5	13.63 ± 0.33***
Aqueous fraction	1000	31.50 ± 0.69***	1219
	500	22.53 ± 1.34***
	250	17.26 ± 0.50***
	125	11.45 ± 1.12***
	62.5	06.86 ± 0.67***
Acarbose	1000	75.50 ± 1.00	50
	500	70.00 ± 0.00
	250	64.50 ± 0.57
	125	56.53 ± 0.55
	62.5	51.63 ± 0.33

All values are taken as Mean ± SEM (n = 3). The P values less than 0.05 were considered as statistically significant. Values significantly different in comparison to standard drug i.e.** = P < 0.01 and *** = P < 0.001

ISSN: 2662-7671