Skip to main content

Table 4 Associations between the view of GP’s role in informing about NPHRs and participants’ sociodemographic characteristics

From: Primary care patients’ perspectives on the use of non-pharmacological home remedies in Geneva: a cross-sectional study

Characteristics

Unadjusted OR (95%CI)

p-value*

Multivariate analysis

Adjusted OR (95%CI)

p-value§

Gender

 

0.04

 

0.07

 Female

1

 

1

 

 Male

1.6 (1.0–2.6)

 

1.6 (1.0–2.5)

 

Age group

 

0.51

 

0.81

  < 40

1

 

1

 

 40–59

1.3 (0.7–2.1)

 

1.1 (0.6–2.1)

 

  ≥ 60

1.2 (0.8–1.8)

 

0.9 (0.5–1.6)

 

Place of residence

 

0.04

 

0.05

 Urban zone

2.0 (1.0–3.8)

 

2.1 (1.0–4.4)

 

 Semi-rural or rural zone

1

 

1

 

Nationality

 

0.28

 

0.12

 Swiss

1.4 (0.7–2.7)

 

1.9 (0.9–4.3)

 

 Other

1

 

1

 

Completed training

 

0.07

 

0.05

 University, FITa, UASa

1.7 (1.0–3.1)

 

1.9 (1.0–3.6)

 

 Other

1

 

1

 

Self-estimated general health status

 

0.82

 

0.86

 Excellent or very good

1

 

1

 

 Good

1.2 (0.6–2.2)

 

1.2 (0.6–2.4)

 

 Moderate or poor

1.3 (0.5–3.2)

 

1.3 (0.5–3.7)

 
  1. aFIT Federal Institute of Technology, UAS University of Applied Sciences
  2. *Univariate logistic regression, adjusted for clustering within practices
  3. §Multivariate logistic regression, adjusted for all variables listed in the table and for clustering within practices