Skip to main content

Table 12 Energy (eV) of HOMO, LUMO, and global chemical reactivity parameters of curcumin, trans-resveratrol, quercetin, and (1 s,4 s)-eucalyptol

From: Interactions of selected cardiovascular active natural compounds with CXCR4 and CXCR7 receptors: a molecular docking, molecular dynamics, and pharmacokinetic/toxicity prediction study

Compound

HOMO

LUMO

∆ E

I

A

χ

ɳ

σ

Pi

S

H

Curcumin

− 157.034

−30.183

126.851

157.034

30.183

93.609

63.426

0.016

−93.609

0.008

126.851

Trans-resveratrol

− 124.950

−32.022

92.928

124.950

32.022

78.486

46.464

0.022

− 78.486

0.011

92.928

Quercetin

−132.436

−36.709

95.727

132.436

36.709

84.573

47.863

0.021

− 84.573

0.010

95.727

(1 s,4 s)-Eucalyptol

− 142.821

−41.780

101.042

142.821

41.780

92.300

50.521

0.020

−92.300

0.010

101.042

  1. HOMO Highest occupied molecular orbital (EHOMO), LUMO Lowest unoccupied molecular orbital, ∆ E HOMO–LUMO energy gap, I Ionization potential, A Electron affinity, χ Absolute electronegativities, ɳ Absolute hardness, σ Absolute softness, Pi Chemical potentials, S Global softness, H Global hardness