Skip to main content

Table 5 Summary of findings for the main comparisons in randomized controlled trials on Huaiqihuang for Henoch-Schönlein purpura nephritis

From: Chinese patent herbal medicine Huaiqihuang for Henoch-Schonlein purpura nephritis in children: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials

Certainty assessment

No. of patients

Effect

Certainty

No. of studies

Study design

Risk of bias

Inconsistency

Indirectness

Imprecision

Other considerations

E

C

Relative

[95% CI]

Absolute

[95% CI]

Clinical cure rate 3

(GC + HQH versus GC)

RCT

Serious a

Not serious

Not serious

Not serious

Publication bias unclear c

49/84

32/82

RR 1.41

[1.06,1.89]

160 more per 1000

[from 23more to 347more]

Low

Clinical cure rate 3

(GC + IS HQH versus GC + IS)

RCT

Serious a

Serious b

Not serious

Not serious

Publication bias unclear c

53/100

29/97

RR 2.02

[0.97,4.18]

Very Low

Total effective rate 3

(GC + HQH versus GC)

RCT

Serious a

Not serious

Not serious

Not serious

Publication bias unclear c

74/84

55/82

RR 1.29

[1.10,1.50]

195 more per 1000

[from 67more to 335more]

Low

Total effective rate 3

(GC + IS+HQH versus GC + IS)

RCT

Serious a

Serious b

Not serious

Not serious

Publication bias unclear c

87/100

58/97

RR 1.52

[1.02,2.26]

311 more per 1000

[from 12more to 753more]

Very Low

Urine sediment erythrocyte 3

(GC + IS+HQH versus GC + IS)

RCT

Not serious

Not serious

Not serious

Not serious

Publication bias unclear c

100

97

MD −9.23

[−10.76, −7.69]

Moderate

Adverse events 3

RCT

Serious a

Not serious

Not serious

Not serious

Publication bias unclear c

9/73

20/70

RR 0.43

[0.15,1.24]

Low

  1. Abbreviations: GC Glucocorticoid, HQH Huaiqihuang, IS Immunosuppressant, + Plus, RCT Randomized controlled trial, No. Number, E Experimental group, C Control group, CI Confidence interval, RR Risk ratio, MD Mean difference
  2. a Random sequence generation, allocation concealment or blinding of the participants and personnel were poorly reported in over 50% of included studies; so certainty of evidence downgraded by one level
  3. b Heterogeneity is ‘serious’ and unexplained, thus, certainty of evidence downgraded by one level
  4. c Due to fewer than 10 articles were included, no publication bias test was performed. And we downgraded it by one level