Table 4 Scaled domain percentages for appraisers of each guideline
Guideline | Domain score (%) | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Scope and purpose | Stakeholder involvement | Rigour of development | Clarity of presentation | Applicability | Editorial Independence | ||
Lam 2019 [32] | Overall Guideline | 94.4 | 55.6 | 51.1 | 66.7 | 10.4 | 58.3 |
CAM Section | 94.4 | 61.1 | 51.1 | 66.7 | 10.4 | 50.0 | |
Silvestri 2019 [33] | Overall Guideline | 83.3 | 38.9 | 45.8 | 38.9 | 25 | 66.7 |
CAM Section | 72.2 | 22.2 | 40.6 | 55.6 | 12.5 | 58.3 | |
Riemann 2017 [35] | Overall Guideline | 100.0 | 72.2 | 58.3 | 94.4 | 25.0 | 70.8 |
CAM Section | 100.0 | 55.6 | 55.2 | 86.1 | 22.9 | 70.8 | |
Qaseem 2016 [37] | Overall Guideline | 100.0 | 88.9 | 91.7 | 100.0 | 25.0 | 91.7 |
CAM Section | 94.4 | 50.0 | 73.9 | 66.7 | 25.0 | 66.7 | |
Denlinger 2014 [38] | Overall Guideline | 83.3 | 63.9 | 24.0 | 47.2 | 20.8 | 37.5 |
CAM Section | 83.3 | 33.3 | 25.0 | 44.4 | 16.7 | 16.7 | |
Howell 2013 [39] | Overall Guideline | 100.0 | 66.7 | 86.5 | 91.7 | 50.0 | 95.8 |
CAM Section | 91.7 | 47.2 | 66.7 | 83.3 | 37.5 | 54.2 | |