Skip to main content

Table 2 Students’ self-reported evaluations about learning TCM

From: An evaluation survey of traditional Chinese medicine learning among international students majoring in conventional medicine: a study from a university in China

Items

Proportion, N (%)

Scorea, mean ± SD

Strongly disagree

Disagree

Agree

Strongly agree

Evaluation of learning background

 Before the course, you had some TCM-related knowledge. (N = 133)

26 (19.5)

79 (59.4)

24 (18.0)

4 (3.0)

2.05 ± 0.71

 Before the course, you were interested in learning TCM. (N = 133)

18 (13.5)

47 (35.3)

47 (35.3)

21 (15.8)

2.53 ± 0.92

Evaluation of the TCM learning course

 You have understood well the content of the course. (N = 132)

2 (1.5)

19 (14.4)

84 (63.6)

27 (20.5)

3.03 ± 0.64

 You have altered your perception of TCM. (N = 132)

4 (3.0)

27 (20.5)

75 (56.8)

26 (19.7)

2.93 ± 0.72

 The course has improved your interest in TCM. (N = 132)

3 (2.3)

41 (31.1)

52 (39.4)

36 (27.3)

2.92 ± 0.82

 You have a deeper understanding of TCM than before. (N = 132)

6 (4.5)

45 (34.1)

69 (52.3)

12 (9.1)

2.66 ± 0.71

 The course brought you many benefits. (N = 132)

2 (1.5)

28 (21.2)

63 (47.7)

39 (29.5)

3.05 ± 0.76

 You are satisfied with the content of the course. (N = 132)

0 (0.0)

18 (13.6)

57 (43.2)

57 (43.2)

3.30 ± 0.70

 You are satisfied with the teaching methods of the course. (N = 132)

3 (2.3)

27 (20.5)

42 (31.8)

60 (45.5)

3.20 ± 0.85

  1. aThe score was obtained by a 4-point Likert scale, where 1 = strongly disagree, 2 = disagree, 3 = agree, 4 = strongly agree. TCM traditional Chinese medicine