Skip to main content

Table 4 Food consumption during the 13-week administration of HT047

From: Safety evaluation of root extract of Pueraria lobata and Scutellaria baicalensis in rats

Weeks

Male dose (mg/kg/day)

Female dose (mg/kg/day)

0a

800

2000

5000

0a

800

2000

5000

0b

24.7 ± 2.2c

24.8 ± 1.5

25.5 ± 2.9

25.4 ± 1.9

22.0 ± 2.1

21.3 ± 2.7

21.2 ± 2.0

20.3 ± 2.3

1

28.2 ± 2.5

27.7 ± 1.8

28.1 ± 2.3

27.6 ± 2.2

22.3 ± 1.6

20.1 ± 1.4**

19.9 ± 1.5**

18.8 ± 3.0**

2

31.7 ± 3.2

30.7 ± 3.0

31.8 ± 3.1

31.9 ± 2.3

24.2 ± 2.2

21.8 ± 1.6*

19.9 ± 1.7**

19.8 ± 2.8**

3

32.2 ± 3.8

31.2 ± 3.8

32.4 ± 2.7

33.4 ± 3.3

25.3 ± 2.7

22.4 ± 3.0*

20.7 ± 2.3**

20.4 ± 2.9**

4

32.5 ± 3.7

30.9 ± 3.3

32.5 ± 2.7

34.5 ± 3.0

26.2 ± 2.7

21.5 ± 1.9**

20.5 ± 1.9**

20.8 ± 3.5**

5

33.4 ± 3.8

31.3 ± 2.7

34.2 ± 3.3

35.5 ± 3.2

26.8 ± 3.1

22.9 ± 1.9##

21.9 ± 1.2##

22.3 ± 3.8##

6

33.5 ± 4.1

31.4 ± 2.6

35.3 ± 3.2

35.3 ± 3.5

26.5 ± 3.1

22.4 ± 2.2##

23.1 ± 1.6##

22.4 ± 4.0#

7

33.7 ± 4.4

31.3 ± 2.5

35.7 ± 2.7

35.8 ± 4.0

25.6 ± 3.4

22.1 ± 1.3##

23.0 ± 2.3

22.2 ± 3.2#

8

33.5 ± 4.4

30.7 ± 2.8

34.7 ± 2.9

34.9 ± 3.8

24.9 ± 2.8

20.9 ± 2.0**

22.2 ± 2.0*

21.7 ± 3.2**

9

33.7 ± 4.4

29.8 ± 2.5*

33.3 ± 3.6

35.0 ± 3.8

24.2 ± 3.1

21.8 ± 2.2

22.3 ± 1.8

21.1 ± 3.2*

10

33.2 ± 4.7

29.8 ± 2.9

32.9 ± 3.0

34.2 ± 4.1

23.9 ± 2.5

21.6 ± 1.5

22.4 ± 3.0

21.6 ± 3.0

11

33.2 ± 5.0

30.1 ± 2.5

32.4 ± 3.5

33.8 ± 3.7

23.3 ± 2.4

20.1 ± 1.4##

21.7 ± 2.5

21.3 ± 3.7

12

32.7 ± 5.2

30.1 ± 2.5

31.4 ± 3.7

32.6 ± 4.0

22.3 ± 2.4

19.6 ± 2.0

21.3 ± 3.1

20.8 ± 3.1

13

31.2 ± 4.3

28.8 ± 1.9

31.5 ± 3.1

32.0 ± 4.4

21.1 ± 2.1

19.7 ± 2.3

20.7 ± 2.8

20.3 ± 4.1

  1. a Distilled water (10 mL/kg/day)
  2. b The day of first treatment was designated week 0
  3. c Values are expressed as grams per rat per day (g/rat/day) (n = 15 for the control and 5000 mg/kg/day groups; n = 10 for the 800 and 2000 mg/kg/day groups)
  4. * p < 0.05 and ** p < 0.01 vs. control by one-way ANOVA with post-hoc Dunnett’s t-test
  5. # p < 0.05 and ## p < 0.01 vs. control by Kruskal-Wallis test with post-hoc Steel's test