The impact of uncertainty in society on the use of traditional, complementary and alternative medicine: a comparative study on visits to alternative/traditional/folk health care practitioners
Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting email@example.com.
|1 Feb 2019||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|12 Mar 2019||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Agnete Egilsdatter Kristoffersen|
|14 Mar 2019||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Sara Quandt|
|7 Apr 2019||Author responded||Author comments - Jimpei Misawa|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|7 Apr 2019||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|14 May 2019||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Agnete Egilsdatter Kristoffersen|
|14 May 2019||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Sara Quandt|
|23 May 2019||Author responded||Author comments - Jimpei Misawa|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|23 May 2019||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|29 Aug 2019||Editorially accepted|
|9 Sep 2019||Article published||10.1186/s12906-019-2662-x|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.