Skip to main content

Table 3 Results of factor loadings using principle axis factor analysis with promax rotation

From: What motivates new, established and long-term users of herbal medicine: is there more than push and pull?

I take HM because …

Factor

1

2

3

Positive aspects of HM

(Pull)

Negative aspects of CM

(Push)

Traditional aspect

(Tradition)

 They are more natural than chemically synthesised medicinal products.

.848

−.103

 

 They have fewer side effects than chemically synthesised medicinal products.

.798

 

−.107

 They are healthier than chemically synthesised medicinal products.

.764

  

 They have a higher tolerability than chemically synthesised med. Products.

.727

  

 In the past, I had positive experiences with herbal medicinal products.

.600

−.206

.318

 They have had a positive impact on my health.

.571

−.147

.283

 Chemically synthesised medicinal products did not show treatment success.

−.189

.772

 

 I was dissatisfied with the conventional medical practitioner.

−.111

.771

 

 Chemically synthesised medicinal products have too strong side effects.

.413

.518

−.116

 Chemically synthesised medicinal products have too many side effects.

.450

.505

−.127

 I trust HM more than chemically synthesised medicinal products.

.256

.433

.221

 In my family we have always used HM.

 

.134

.752

 I am very familiar with herbal medicinal products since my childhood.

  

.738

% of variance explained

45.14

11.50

10.37

  1. Extraction method: principle axe factor analysis. Rotation method: Promax with Kaiser normalisation. Rotation converged in seven iterations. Values below .1 not shown in the table. Bold numbers indicate the highest loadings per factor of the associated item