Skip to main content

Table 3 Results of subgroup analysis by treatment duration, frequency, and specific acupoints

From: Optimizing acupuncture treatment for dry eye syndrome: a systematic review

Variables

Number of studies

Number of eyes

SMD

95%CI

Heterogeneity (I2)

MD (95% CI)

Acupuncture

AT

Duration

Short term

7

586

488

0.54

0.30–0.78

86%

−0.41 (−1.10, 0.28)

Long term

4

148

106

0.95

0.30–1.59

87%

Frequency

Less frequent

4

250

208

0.49

0.19–0.79

79%

−0.22 (−0.67, 0.22)

Intensive

7

484

386

0.71

0.37–1.05

90%

BL1

Included

4

270

214

0.60

0.29–0.91

81%

−0.04 (−0.49, 0.41)

Not included

7

464

380

0.64

0.32–.0.96

89%

BL2a

Included

4

264

264

0.35

0.11–0.60

71%

−0.46 (− 0.86, − 0.06)

Not included

8

470

360

0.81

0.49–1.12

89%

ST1a

Included

5

330

336

0.28

0.01–0.52

77%

−0.63 (−1.02, − 0.24)

Not included

7

404

288

0.91

0.60–1.22

85%

ST2

Included

4

148

106

0.95

0.30–1.59

91%

0.41 (−0.28, 1.10)

Not included

7

586

488

0.54

0.30–0.78

86%

TE23a

Included

6

354

348

0.59

0.25–0.96

88%

−0.10 (− 0.55, 0.35)

Not included

6

380

276

0.69

0.40–0.99

87%

Ex-HN5

Included

6

398

350

0.60

0.27–0.93

88%

−0.03 (−0.56, 0.50)

Not included

5

336

244

0.63

0.30–0.96

86%

  1. aWang et al. [15] study consists of two different acupuncture group. One group included BL2, ST1, TE23 and the other did not. For the reason, number of studies and number of eyes of AT group was double-counted