Skip to main content

Table 3 Log10 HA titer from HA assay in combined treatments with virus compared to virus control group

From: South African medicinal plant extracts active against influenza A virus

 

Treatment

Extract type

Log HA (mean ± SD)

   

Co-pen

Pre-pen

Post-pen

Combined treatments

Pittosporum viridiflorum, 2

Cold water

1.51 ± 1.17

1.20 ± 0.93**

1.30 ± 1.02*

Pittosporum viridiflorum, 3

Acetone

0.90 ± 0.97**

1.00 ± 1.12**

1.00 ± 0.82**

Pittosporum viridiflorum, 4

30% ethanol

1.61 ± 1.24

0.60 ± 0.93**

0.60 ± 0.93**

Pittosporum viridiflorum, 5

100% ethanol

0.90 ± 1.17**

1.00 ± 1.12**

1.00 ± 1.12**

Pittosporum viridiflorum, 6

Methanol

1.51 ± 1.17

1.30 ± 1.02*

1.00 ± 0.78**

Cussonia spicata, 9

Acetone

1.40 ± 1.09

1.30 ± 1.02*

1.51 ± 1.17

Cussonia spicata, 11

100% ethanol

1.61 ± 1.24

1.81 ± 0.47

1.61 ± 1.24

Cussonia spicata, 12

Methanol

1.61 ± 1.24

2.01 ± 0.41

1.61 ± 1.02

Rapanea melanophloeos, 13

Methanol

0.00 ± 0.00**

0.60 ± 0.93**

0.30 ± 0.00**

Tabernaemontana ventricosa, 14

Methanol

2.31 ± 0.16

2.21 ± 0.16

2.31 ± 0.16

Clerodendrum glabrum, 15

Methanol

1.40 ± 0.78

1.91 ± 0.56

1.51 ± 1.17

Amantadine hydrochloride

–

0.60 ± 0.93**

0.80 ± 0.82**

0.90 ± 0.97**

Oseltamivir carboxylate

–

0.60 ± 0.93**

0.60 ± 0.93**

0.70 ± 1.09**

No extract treatment

Influenza virus

–

2.51 ± 0.31

2.51 ± 0.31

2.51 ± 0.31

  1. Data presented as mean ± SD are averages of 3 independent HA titration. *, **: Significantly and highly significantly different from values obtained for extract-treated samples compared to virus inoculated untreated sample (P ≤ 0.05 & P ≤ 0.01) analyzed by SPSS, LSD post-hoc test