Skip to main content

Table 2 Characteristics of the participants (n = 466)b

From: Attitudes and knowledge about direct and indirect risks among conventional and complementary health care providers in cancer care

 

Total (n = 466)

Medical doctor (n = 142)

Nurse (n = 69)

Providers with dual training (n = 32)

Complementary therapist (n = 223)

p-value

 

n

%

n

%

n

%

n

%

n

%

 

Gender

          

< 0.001*

 Male

108

27.5

69

51.5

  

3

12.5

36

19.3

 

 Female

285

72.5

65

48.5

48

100

21

87.5

151

80.7

 

 Missing

73

 

8

 

21

 

8

 

36

  

Age. years

          

< 0.001**

 Mean age

373

48.7

127

45.4

45

51.2

24

52.2

177

50.1

 

 Missing

93

 

15

 

24

 

8

 

46

  

Education

          

< 0.001^

 Compulsory

2

0.5

      

2

1.1

 

 Middle level

33

8.4

      

33

17.6

 

 University up to 4 years

112

28.4

  

23

46.9

11

44

78

41.7

 

 University more than 4 years/PhD

248

62.8

134

100

26

53.1

14

56

74

39.6

 

 Missing

71

 

8

 

20

 

7

 

36

  

Profession*

 Oncology doctor

27

5.8

27

100

       

 Family physician

118

25.3

116

99.1

  

2 a

1.8

   

 Oncology nurse

89

19.1

  

69

77.5

20

22.5

   

 Acupuncturist

150

32.2

    

25

16.7

125

83.3

 

 Massage therapist

82

17.6

    

6

7.3

76

92.7

 

 Reflexologist/zonetherapist

35

7.5

    

1

2.9

34

97.1

 

Clinical practice

          

< 0.001^

 Full time health provider

287

72.1

121

89.6

38

77.6

18

72

110

58.2

 

 Part time health provider

92

23.1

11

8.1

10

20.4

5

20

66

34.9

 

 Other (students or retired persons)

19

4.8

3

2.2

1

2

2

8

13

6.9

 

 Missing

68

 

7

 

20

 

7

 

34

  

Patient visits per week

          

< 0.001*

 1-19 patients

131

33.8

10

7.6

27

57.4

4

16

90

48.6

 

 20–39 patients

121

31.2

28

21.4

17

36.2

5

20

71

38.4

 

 40 or more patients

136

35.1

93

71

3

6.4

16

64

24

13

 

 Missing

78

 

11

 

22

 

7

 

38

  

Cancer patient visits per week

         

< 0.001^

 1–19 cancer patients

361

92.1

125

92.6

31

64.6

23

92

182

98.9

 

 20 and more patients

31

7.9

10

7.4

17

35.4

2

8

2

1.1

 

 Missing

74

 

7

 

21

 

7

 

39

  

Location

          

0.005*

 Rural area

118

29.7

56

41.5

7

14.6

3

12

52

27.5

 

 Small city. Village (up to 50.000 inhabitants)

153

38.5

44

32.6

23

47.9

12

48

74

39.2

 

 Large city (> 50.000 inhabitants)

126

31.7

35

25.9

18

37.5

10

40

63

33.3

 

 Missing

69

 

7

 

21

 

7

 

34

  
  1. *Pearson’s chi-square test; **One way anova test; ^Fisher’s exact test; bDue to multiple response on one or more variables, the analyzed numbers do not always add up to the total number; aThese adds to > 32 because providers have more than one area of training