Skip to main content

Table 2 Mean difference (95%CIs) of CO (right upper part) and SV (left lower part)

From: Comparative efficacy of Chinese herbal injections for treating chronic heart failure: a network meta-analysis

CO
SV HQI + WM −0.22(−2.09,1.59) −0.97(− 2.61,0.80) −0.64(− 2.68,1.31) −0.36(− 2.21,1.53) −0.20(− 2.14,1.82) 0.32(− 1.29,1.99)
−1.92(− 21.24,16.33) SFI + WM − 0.73(− 1.69,0.34) −0.46(− 1.89,1.03) −0.12(− 1.36,1.13) 0.03(−1.38,1.49) 0.55(− 0.29,1.43)
− 6.07(− 21.13,9.09) −4.32(− 17.07,9.69) SI + WM 0.29(− 1.02,1.51) 0.61(− 0.46,1.58) 0.77(− 0.54,1.98) 1.29(0.74,1.72)
−3.05(− 20.33,14.23) −1.10(− 17.34,15.64) 2.99(− 8.76,14.46) SMI + WM 0.32(− 1.15,1.77) 0.46(− 1.15,2.13) 0.99(− 0.17,2.16)
− 5.74(− 23.58,11.31) −3.84(− 20.16,12.65) 0.25(− 11.63,12.08) − 2.51(− 17.27,11.40) SQFZI + WM 0.14(− 1.31,1.65) 0.68(− 0.21,1.57)
__ __ __ __ __ YQFMI + WM 0.52(− 0.64,1.68)
3.28(− 10.90,17.25) 5.12(− 6.59,18.01) 9.35(3.75,14.90) 6.46(−3.94,16.34) 9.04(− 1.36,19.54) __ WM
  1. Note: The result underlined meant it had statistical significant
\