Skip to main content

Table 1 Odds ratios/mean difference (95%CIs) of the clinical effective rate (right upper part) and LVEF (left lower part)

From: Comparative efficacy of Chinese herbal injections for treating chronic heart failure: a network meta-analysis

the clinical effective rate

LVEF

HQI + WM

0.98(0.62,1.49)

1.03(0.62,1.59)

1.15(0.65,1.96)

1.00(0.60,1.76)

0.67(0.36,1.28)

0.28(0.19,0.41)

0.13(−7.46,7.87)

SFI + WM

1.05(0.76,1.41)

1.17(0.79,1.83)

1.05(0.72,1.60)

0.69(0.42,1.21)

0.29(0.24,0.35)

−4.31(−11.77,4.08)

− 4.50(−8.43,1.48)

SI + WM

1.12(0.73,1.75)

1.00(0.67,1.58)

0.66(0.39,1.16)

0.28(0.22,0.35)

−3.08(−12.25,5.93)

−3.26(−9.21,3.26)

1.03(− 5.62,7.12)

SMI + WM

0.88(0.52,1.51)

0.59(0.31,1.10)

0.25(0.17,0.36)

−2.60(−12.30,7.90)

− 2.69(− 10.87,5.50)

1.63(−6.79,9.48)

0.38(−8.25,9.34)

SQFZI + WM

0.66(0.36,1.23)

0.28(0.19,0.39)

−3.11(−12.39,6.93)

− 3.17(− 10.26,4.48)

1.26(−6.88,8.28)

0.25(−8.18,8.53)

−0.50(− 10.09,9.22)

YQFMI + WM

0.42(0.25,0.70)

4.27(− 2.61,11.46)

4.05(1.00,7.59)

8.61(4.22,10.99)

7.29(1.97,12.70)

6.81(−0.59,14.06)

7.26(0.42,13.64)

WM

  1. Note: The result underlined meant it had statistical significant