Skip to main content

Table 1 Odds ratios/mean difference (95%CIs) of the clinical effective rate (right upper part) and LVEF (left lower part)

From: Comparative efficacy of Chinese herbal injections for treating chronic heart failure: a network meta-analysis

the clinical effective rate
LVEF HQI + WM 0.98(0.62,1.49) 1.03(0.62,1.59) 1.15(0.65,1.96) 1.00(0.60,1.76) 0.67(0.36,1.28) 0.28(0.19,0.41)
0.13(−7.46,7.87) SFI + WM 1.05(0.76,1.41) 1.17(0.79,1.83) 1.05(0.72,1.60) 0.69(0.42,1.21) 0.29(0.24,0.35)
−4.31(−11.77,4.08) − 4.50(−8.43,1.48) SI + WM 1.12(0.73,1.75) 1.00(0.67,1.58) 0.66(0.39,1.16) 0.28(0.22,0.35)
−3.08(−12.25,5.93) −3.26(−9.21,3.26) 1.03(− 5.62,7.12) SMI + WM 0.88(0.52,1.51) 0.59(0.31,1.10) 0.25(0.17,0.36)
−2.60(−12.30,7.90) − 2.69(− 10.87,5.50) 1.63(−6.79,9.48) 0.38(−8.25,9.34) SQFZI + WM 0.66(0.36,1.23) 0.28(0.19,0.39)
−3.11(−12.39,6.93) − 3.17(− 10.26,4.48) 1.26(−6.88,8.28) 0.25(−8.18,8.53) −0.50(− 10.09,9.22) YQFMI + WM 0.42(0.25,0.70)
4.27(− 2.61,11.46) 4.05(1.00,7.59) 8.61(4.22,10.99) 7.29(1.97,12.70) 6.81(−0.59,14.06) 7.26(0.42,13.64) WM
  1. Note: The result underlined meant it had statistical significant
\