Skip to main content

Table 2 Practitioner type mix across study sites

From: Integrative health care – What are the relevant health outcomes from a practice perspective? A survey

Practitioner type Study site:
CAM 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21
 Acupuncturist X X X X X X X     X X X X X X   X X X X
 Massage Therapist   X X X   X X X   X   X    X X X X X X X
 Naturpath X    X    X   X    X X   X X X X X X  
 Chiropractor     X   X X X   X   X    X X X X    
 TCM   X X X X        X   X     X X X  
 Homeopath   X    X   X               
 Osteopath   X           X X         
 Yoga instructor    X                  X  
 Cranio-sacral                X       
 Shiatsu therapist                X       
 Reflexologist                     X  
 Vibration therapist                      X
Conventional 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21
 Medical doctor X   X X   X    X   X X X X X X    X X  
 Physiotherapist     X   X   X   X      X X X X X X X
 Nurse X    X         X    X X    X X  
 Psychologist   X X X X         X X       X  
 Nutritionist X          X X X X    X     X  
 Coach    X              X      X
 Counsellor        X     X X          
 Kinesiologist       X      X           
 Athletic Therapist                      X
 Psychotherapist                X       
 Social Worker                  x     
 Personal trainer                 X      
 Exercise Physiologist                 X      
 Weight Loss consultant     X                  
 Hypnotherapist        X               
Number of practitioners types: 5 6 7 10 4 6 7 3 2 4 5 10 6 4 10 11 5 6 7 11 6
aBalance of practitioner types: C CA CA E CA E CA CA E E C CA E E CA CO CA CA CA CA E
  1. aC = higher number of conventional practitioners; CA = higher number of CAM practitioners; E = equal number of conventional and CAM practitioners