Skip to main content

Table 5 Effect of cisplatin (CP) and different treatments of AHE on liver tissue protein, H2O2, nitrite content and lipid peroxidation

From: Modulatory influence of Acacia hydaspica R. Parker ethyl acetate extract against cisplatin inveigled hepatic injury and dyslipidemia in rats

Group

Protein (μg/mg Tissue)

H2O2 (nM/min/mg Tissue)

Nitrite (NO) (content μM/ml)

MDA (nM/min/mg protein)

Control

4.66 ± 0.05b

1.97 ± 0.06b

34.77 ± 1.32b

3.5 ± 0.156b

CP

1.19 ± 0.05a

5.39 ± 0.256a

90.41 ± 1.28a

8.97 ± 0.337a

AHE alone

4.67 ± 0.15b

1.32 ± 0.06b

36.24 ± 0.96b

3.153 ± 0.087 b

CP + AHE

3.25 ± 0.13a,b,d**

4.325 ± 0.198a,b**,d

71.48 ± 1.86a,b,d

6.11 ± 0.504a,b, d*

AHE + CP

3.92 ± 0.04a**,b, c**

2.38 ± 0.189b,c

41.09 ± 0.69a*,b,c

4.84 ± 0.06a*,b,c*

CP + Sily

3.93 ± 0.11a**,b

2.39 ± 0.037b

40.98 ± 1.38a*,b

4.90 ± 0.107a*,b

  1. Values expressed as mean ± SEM
  2. a Significance at p < 0.0001 Vs. control group
  3. b Significance at p < 0.0001 Vs. Cisplatin (CP) group
  4. c Significance at p < 0.0001 of AHE + CP pre-treated group Vs. CP + AHE post-treated group
  5. d Significance at p < 0.0001 of CP + AHE treatment groups Vs CP + Sily group
  6. *,** Significant difference at p < 0.001. Non-significant difference (p > 0.05) was recorded between control and AHE alone treated group in all parameters (One way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s multiple comparison tests)