Skip to main content

Table 1 Comparing mean accuracy statistics (with 95% Confidence Intervals) of MRT and Intuition, for Experiments 1 and 2

From: Estimating the accuracy of muscle response testing: two randomised-order blinded studies

  Experiment 1 Experiment 2
(n = 48) (n = 20)
MRT Intuition   MRT Intuition  
Mean 95% CI Mean 95% CI p-value Mean 95% CI Mean 95% CI p-value
Overall Fraction Correct 0.659 0.623 - 0.695 0.474 0.449 - 0.500 <0.01* 0.594 0.541 - 0.647 0.514 0.483 - 0.544 0.01*
Sensitivity 0.568 0.504 - 0.633 0.429 0.374 - 0.484 <0.01* 0.583 0.534 - 0.631 0.603 0.555 - 0.650 0.61
Specificity 0.734 0.687 - 0.782 0.479 0.416 - 0.542 <0.01* 0.613 0.553 - 0.673 0.494 0.427 - 0.561 0.01
Positive Predictive Value 0.663 0.607 - 0.718 0.527 0.460 - 0.594 <0.01* 0.685 0.616 - 0.754 0.603 0.555 - 0.650 0.06
Negative Predictive Value 0.667 0.625 - 0.708 0.392 0.335 - 0.448 <0.01* 0.503 0.421 - 0.584 0.425 0.356 - 0.494 0.07
  1. MRT muscle response testing, CI confidence interval; *reached significance