Skip to main content

Table 5 Analysis of the associations and powers of models of the HW phenotype and all phenotypes consisting of an individual index with/without the TG level to predict SBP

From: Predictors of metabolic abnormalities in phenotypes that combined anthropometric indices and triglycerides

Variable

Crude

Adjustment

AUC

Phenotype

AUC

 

p

OR (95 % CI)

p

OR (95 % CI)

NB

LR

 

NB

LR

HW phenotypea

<0.0001

2.362 (2.029–2.749)

<0.0001

1.646 (1.397–1.938)

     

TG

<0.0001

1.377 (1.3–1.459)

<0.0001

1.24 (1.165–1.321)

0.62

0.631

   

Age

<0.0001

2.345 (2.152–2.555)

  

0.707

0.707

Age + TG

0.713

0.718

Weight

<0.0001

1.153 (1.078–1.234)

<0.0001

1.271 (1.183–1.366)

0.547

0.541

Weight + TG

0.621

0.627***

BMI

<0.0001

1.483 (1.388–1.585)

<0.0001

1.364 (1.267–1.468)

0.62

0.621

BMI + TG

0.644

0.649***

NeckC

<0.0001

1.449 (1.356–1.548)

<0.0001

1.309 (1.216–1.409)

0.616

0.616

NeckC + TG

0.641

0.648*

ChestC

<0.0001

1.529 (1.428–1.637)

<0.0001

1.355 (1.255–1.463)

0.627

0.627

ChestC + TG

0.645

0.65***

RibC

<0.0001

1.714 (1.601–1.834)

<0.0001

1.385 (1.28–1.498)

0.665

0.665

RibC + TG

0.672

0.677*

WaistC (WC)

<0.0001

1.677 (1.564–1.797)

<0.0001

1.334 (1.233–1.444)

0.653

0.653

WaistC + TG

0.61

0.626***

HipC

<0.0001

1.178 (1.101–1.26)

<0.0001

1.187 (1.104–1.278)

0.54

0.543

HipC + TG

0.623

0.637***

Neck_Hip

<0.0001

1.269 (1.188–1.356)

0.0043

1.114 (1.035–1.2)

0.575

0.575

Neck_Hip + TG

0.626

0.635***

Axillary_Hip

<0.0001

1.356 (1.267–1.452)

<0.0001

1.211 (1.122–1.307)

0.591

0.592

Axillary_Hip + TG

0.647

0.651***

Chest_Hip

<0.0001

1.563 (1.459–1.676)

<0.0001

1.295 (1.196–1.402)

0.629

0.629

Chest_Hip + TG

0.647

0.651***

Rib_Hip

<0.0001

1.888 (1.758–2.029)

<0.0001

1.388 (1.273–1.513)

0.685

0.685

Rib_Hip + TG

0.687

0.692*

Waist_Hip (WHR)

<0.0001

1.835 (1.707–1.972)

<0.0001

1.327 (1.217–1.446)

0.67

0.67

Waist_Hip + TG

0.675

0.681***

Pelvic_Hip

<0.0001

1.649 (1.531–1.777)

<0.0001

1.25 (1.142–1.369)

0.639

0.641

Pelvic_Hip + TG

0.657

0.663***

Forehead_Waist

<0.0001

0.542 (0.5–0.586)

<0.0001

0.717 (0.655–0.784)

0.663

0.663

Forehead_Waist + TG

0.666

0.673***

Neck_Waist

<0.0001

0.678 (0.63–0.731)

0.0007

0.866 (0.796–0.941)

0.609

0.609

Neck_Waist + TG

0.633

0.641***

Forehead_Rib

<0.0001

0.519 (0.48–0.561)

<0.0001

0.677 (0.619–0.742)

0.676

0.676

Forehead_Rib + TG

0.677

0.683**

Forehead_Chest

<0.0001

0.602 (0.559–0.649)

<0.0001

0.712 (0.654–0.776)

0.639

0.639

Forehead_Chest + TG

0.65

0.654***

WHtR

<0.0001

1.318 (1.233–1.408)

<0.0001

1.322 (1.23–1.421)

0.581

0.584

WHtR + TG

0.626

0.632***

  1. Adjustments for age and site (investigation site), OR odds ratio, CI confidence interval, AUC area under the receiver operating characteristic curve, NB naïve Bayes, LR logistic regression
  2. Significant difference between a single anthropometric index and phenotype on AUCs determined by LR, * p = <0.01, ** p = <0.0001, and *** p = <0.00001
  3. a There were 1182 women with the HW phenotype in the normal SBP group (n = 6756) and 302 in the high SBP group (n = 905)
Back to article page

BMC Complementary Medicine and Therapies

ISSN: 2662-7671

Contact us