Skip to main content

Table 2 Total phenolic content, % MG trapping, % DPPH radical scavenging activity, and % inhibition of MG-derived AGEs of extracts (1 mg/mL)

From: Inhibitory effect of herbal medicines and their trapping abilities against methylglyoxal-derived advanced glycation end-products

Plant samples

Total phenolic content (mg/g extract)

% MG trapping

% DPPH radical scavenging activity

% Inhibition of MG-derived AGEs

Rhinacanthus nasutus

90.98 ± 0.61

20.87 ± 0.92

11.79 ± 2.59

79.98 ± 5.58

Cissus quadrangularis

12.16 ± 0.47

13.97 ± 1.36

0.31 ± 0.03

4.60 ± 1.85

Syzygium aromaticum

272.36 ± 4.50

58.97 ± 3.07

73.52 ± 0.62

60.73 ± 0.74

Acanthus ebracteatus

25.96 ± 0.28

15.70 ± 3.34

4.44 ± 1.00

N.I.

Thunbergia laurifolia

85.64 ± 0.64

30.88 ± 0.51

19.37 ± 2.81

N.I.

Phyllanthus amarus

201.72 ± 1.89

55.91 ± 2.76

54.08 ± 1.00

63.70 ± 2.05

Cassia alata

88.66 ± 0.42

32.69 ± 1.23

11.33 ± 2.29

30.08 ± 0.97

Pluchea indica

60.55 ± 0.30

20.77 ± 2.58

12.91 ± 1.63

N.I.

Schefflera leucantha

35.25 ± 0.94

25.35 ± 0.96

2.87 ± 1.51

4.01 ± 0.86

Cryptolepis buchanani

84.19 ± 0.47

23.53 ± 2.56

20.38 ± 1.46

4.03 ± 0.43

Derris scandens

106.75 ± 0.62

42.18 ± 1.89

2.13 ± 0.9

26.23 ± 0.68

Aminoguanidine

N.D.

99.58 ± 0.21

N.D.

79.54 ± 0.79

Gallic acid

N.D.

N.D.

87.85 ± 2.28

N.D.

  1. Results are represented as mean ± SEM (n = 3). N.D. = not determined N.I. = No inhibition