Skip to main content

Table 3 Prevalence, modes and characteristics of CAM use among patients with T2D (n = 333)

From: Prevalence and correlates of complementary and alternative medicine use among diabetic patients in Beirut, Lebanon: a cross-sectional study

Prevalence and types of CAM used among diabetic patients

n (%)

Used CAM in the previous year

 

Yes

70(21)

No

263(79)

Used CAM since diagnosis

 

Yes

127(38.1)

No

206(61.9)

CAM related characteristics among CAM users (n = 127)

 

CAM choice*

 

Friends

84(66.1)

Media

25(19.7)

Family believes

14(11.0)

Personal choice

13(10.2)

Health practitioner

9(7.1)

Reasons of CAM use*

 

Trying CAM for the sake of experiment

81(63.8)

Belief in advantages of CAM practices

53(41.7)

Looking for another solution

23(18.1)

Lost hope with conventional therapy

6(4.7)

CAM is accessible and available

1(0.8)

What was your expectation when you were using CAM

 

Prevent progression of diabetes

34(26.8)

No expectations

29(22.8)

Complete cure of disease

28(22.0)

Lowering blood glucose level

24(19.0)

Weight loss

3(2.4)

Better health status

2(1.6)

Other**

6(4.7)

Feeling after CAM use*

 

Feeling of strengthening of body

60(47.2)

Feeling of no change

58(45.7)

Feeling of disappearance of several symptoms

40(31.5)

Feeling of being in good psychological condition

31(24.4)

Feeling physically worse

7(5.5)

Feeling rise of several symptoms

6(4.7)

Not decided

2(1.6)

Feeling of being in bad psychological condition

1(0.8)

Fear of the product and its effect

1(0.8)

Improvement of sexual life

1(0.8)

How do you assess the usefulness of CAM?

 

No useful at all

45(35.4)

Very useful

30(23.6)

Not sure/unable to assess

28(22.0)

Of limited usefulness

24(18.9)

Side effects from CAM use

 

Yes

13(10.2)

No

113(89.0)

Undecided

1(0.8)

Would you use CAM again?

 

Yes

64(50.4)

No

59(46.5)

Undecided

4(3.1)

Would you Recommended CAM to other T2DM patients?

 

Yes

46(37.1)

No

49(39.5)

Undecided

29(23.4)

Was your use complementary or alternative (n = 86)?

 

Complementary

68(79.1)

Alternative

18(20.9)

Did you consult a doctor before using CAM (n = 130)?

 

Yes

9(6.9)

No

121(93.1)

CAM related characteristics among diabetic non-users (n = 206)

 

Reasons for not using CAM*

 

Do not believe in it

133(64.6)

The doctor did not prescribe it

58(28.1)

Afraid of the side effects

47(22.8)

Never heard of it

15(7.3)

Additional expenses and useless

14(6.8)

Do no need it

12(5.8)

Mainstream medicine is the best

4(1.9)

Not interested

4(1.9)

CAM is not evidence based

3(1.4)

No one advised its use

3(1.4)

Other***

3 (1.4)

Would you consider using CAM in the future

 

Yes

37(18.0)

No

169(82.0)

  1. * More than one answer was applicable.
  2. Other **: *Other expectations when you were using CAM: Getting rid from sorcery spell (n = 1), Cure from osteoarthritis (n = 1), Pain relief (n = 2), Stop using medications (n = 1), feeling psychologically better (n = 1).
  3. Other ***There is no definite and ultimate cure for T2DM, Negligence, Old way of treating diseases.
  4. These questions were asked only to CAM non users.