Consumers' experiences and values in conventional and alternative medicine paradigms: a problem detection study (PDS)
Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting email@example.com.
|20 Oct 2011||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|21 Nov 2011||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Heather Boon|
|22 Nov 2011||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Jo-Anne Rayner|
|2 Dec 2011||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Aslak Steinsbekk|
|12 Jan 2012||Author responded||Author comments - Susan Tett|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|12 Jan 2012||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|12 Jan 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Aslak Steinsbekk|
|23 Jan 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Heather Boon|
|31 Jan 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Jo-Anne Rayner|
|20 Feb 2012||Author responded||Author comments - Susan Tett|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|20 Feb 2012||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|10 Apr 2012||Editorially accepted|
|10 Apr 2012||Article published||10.1186/1472-6882-12-39|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.