Skip to main content

Table 3 Mechanical detection and pain thresholds at T1, T2 and estimated group differences at T2 (Mean ± SD)

From: The influence of a series of five dry cupping treatments on pain and mechanical thresholds in patients with chronic non-specific neck pain - a randomised controlled pilot study

  

T1

T2

ESTIMATED DIFFERENCE AT T2

ANCOVA

  

TREATMENT GROUP

(N = 22)

(MEAN ± SD)

WAITING LIST CONTROL GROUP

(N = 24)

(MEAN ± SD)

TREATMENT GROUP

(N = 22)

(MEAN ± SD)

WAITING LIST CONTROL GROUP

(N = 24)

(MEAN ± SD)

DIFF TREATMENT GROUP VS. WAITING LIST CONTROL GROUP*

(95% CI)

DF

F

P

MDT lg(mN)

Pain Maximum

0.58 ± 0.42

0.29 ± 0.44

0.51 ± 0.35

0.38 ± 0.41

0.007 (-0.21 to 0.22)

1/42

0.00

0.95

 

Pain Adjacent

0.34 ± 0.41

0.25 ± 0.31

0.32 ± 0.44

0.25 ± 0.37

0.003 (-0.21 to 0.21)

1/42

0.00

0.98

 

Hand

0.08 ± 0.40

0.19 ± 0.35

0.07 ± 0.39

0.16 ± 0.44

0.04 (-0.16 to 0.24)

1/42

0.18

0.67

 

Foot

0.42 ± 0.41

0.55 ± 0.31

0.41 ± 0.37

0.58 ± 0.27

-0.06 (-0.20 to 0.09)

1/42

0.03

0.44

VDT x/8

Pain Maximum

6.45 ± 0.96

5.93 ± 1.06

6.80 ± 1.11

6.28 ± 0.96

0.15 (-0.29 to 0.59)

1/42

0.47

0.50

 

Pain Adjacent

6.17 ± 0.98

5.43 ± 1.02

6.69 ± 1.18

5.82 ± 1.05

0.29 (-0.23 to 0.82)

1/42

1.26

0.27

 

Hand

7.53 ± 0.56

7.26 ± 0.80

7.39 ± 0,76

7.10 ± 0.68

0.14 (-0.22 to 0.49)

1/42

0.61

0.44

 

Foot

6.03 ± 1.17

5.78 ± 1.02

6.17 ± 1.22

5.75 ± 1.01

0.35 (-0.06 to 0.76)

1/42

3.05

0.09

PPT lg(kPa)

Pain Maximum

2.36 ± 0.25

2.43 ± 0.24

2.41 ± 0.26

2.39 ± 0.20

0.08 (0.01 to 0.16)

1/42

5.35

0.026

 

Pain Adjacent

2.40 ± 0.21

2.50 ± 0.19

2.44 ± 0.21

2.43 ± 0.15

0.11 (0.05 to 0.17)

1/42

13.23

0.001

 

Hand

2.43 ± 0.16

2.53 ± 0.15

2.44 ± 0.16

2.44 ± 0.16

0.07 (0.01 to 0.14)

1/42

4.78

0.034

 

Foot

2.29 ± 0.18

2.35 ± 0.18

2.48 ± 0.19

2.41 ± 0.21

0.12 (0.04 to 0.20)

1/42

9.13

0.004

  1. MDT = mechanical-detection threshold
  2. PPT = pressure-pain threshold
  3. VDT = vibration-detection threshold
  4. An ANCOVA model with 2 groups, baseline values and expectancy as covariates revealed significant group differences in PPT at all areas.